<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abandoned Goods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://propertyblogs.co.nz/2010/06/abandoned-goods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://propertyblogs.co.nz/2010/06/abandoned-goods/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: perrynz</title>
		<link>http://propertyblogs.co.nz/2010/06/abandoned-goods/comment-page-1/#comment-2936</link>
		<dc:creator>perrynz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propertyblogs.co.nz/?p=790#comment-2936</guid>
		<description>Always a giggle how this sort of bias against LLs and in favour of tenants never seems to rate a mention by Tenant Advocates (and tenants themselves) when LLs rightly complain about how heavily weighted the RTA is in favour of tenants. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always a giggle how this sort of bias against LLs and in favour of tenants never seems to rate a mention by Tenant Advocates (and tenants themselves) when LLs rightly complain about how heavily weighted the RTA is in favour of tenants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grrrr</title>
		<link>http://propertyblogs.co.nz/2010/06/abandoned-goods/comment-page-1/#comment-2881</link>
		<dc:creator>Grrrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propertyblogs.co.nz/?p=790#comment-2881</guid>
		<description>If the tenant has seen to ABANDON the property, then obviously everything there is not worth keeping.   
 
Why does a LL have to go through all the hassle of storing, seeking a Tribunal order for sale/destruction, banking any money recovered with Tenancy Services, then RE-applying for the monies to be released - when the tenant can&#039;t be a***d doing anything about their own belongings!!! 
 
Time whoever wrote the RTA got a touch of reality, instead of sitting behind their desks actively protecting the tenant. 
 
Rant over!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the tenant has seen to ABANDON the property, then obviously everything there is not worth keeping.   </p>
<p>Why does a LL have to go through all the hassle of storing, seeking a Tribunal order for sale/destruction, banking any money recovered with Tenancy Services, then RE-applying for the monies to be released &#8211; when the tenant can&#39;t be a***d doing anything about their own belongings!!! </p>
<p>Time whoever wrote the RTA got a touch of reality, instead of sitting behind their desks actively protecting the tenant. </p>
<p>Rant over!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 326/330 objects using disk: basic

Served from: propertyblogs.co.nz @ 2012-02-10 00:43:42 -->
